So now i am trying to get a hold on what fashion is meaning today currently.
My favorite trends are
People who look they tattoo culture but have no tatts
All of these things I like because one, they seem pertinant to both high fashion and have connection to fashion and music and books etc.
Two I like them because they are what fashion is about—getting photoed…they show up well in obscure natural settings as well as new urban settings. And three they seem to be displaying either highly gendered Or conversly non gendered religions…totally current.. And four i dig the active wear aspect of fashion that has cropped up anywhere there is a phone.
Next coming: communication and fashion.
The fine purveyor of rum at the time of gilgamesh would have no recourse to fashion of course unless they were in america looking at england or vice versa.
Since thats not the case (all of this being a historical ethnicity trip of drink v. “fashion or otherwise”) we shall look at it in terms of england on norses and americans “future americans” on town dwellings or the non boating writers of olde english (perhaps even european depending on the level of isolation that was present in terms of travel)
Now having been born of the perusing south ie south america, nobody could get you and editing job…actually none to the get your country at or from. But rum may not have been a southern plantation and furthermore sugar cane was not your average coc puff. Which was the law that persia had been working in the americas yet without being there…condemning of course the whole nation (also a time loop for ones average common and sometimes average non urban non asiatic shall we say drunk of a “ripeness). so the actual apriori meaning came to those that both walked and boated (jungle to belted jungle) in the deforestation patterns that those of india may have found kingly. And as the genetic information has found…those treks were not uncommon nor misleading on a genetic level. So rum actually found its way possibly to to termites before to the actual woodpulp that was its predescessor. looking at it twice we can infer that since the dutch were somewhat obviously of the jewish ( having invented the wood (from cane) pulp) class perfidity their economic structure was most dissimilar from the speltish germans (whom also the mortals/had relegated into an earthen debt) and within their morbidity structures it may have been more pervasive to drink the metals –ie cook the leaf with sulphur…especially seeing as how nowadays very few people can get coca leaves from the tree much less get the dutch to run matches out of iceland or greenland. Now tinder was another item that your average rational non/staunch nationalist would reccommend. But it was not available unless you could cut the poe or the popes nose and he stopped drinking at 7am and 12 on sundays other than that he was the only person that would drink regularly..
Apriori to there being a biscuit and bread law there were rum laws…outside of the roan noak whithin india…outside india being persia as district.
Seeking no metaphors the sic detective could and would only investingate thoroughally those people speaking hindi ie dutch outside customs.
Now if you see it my way….speaking if you can get of the mind that england was still at that time (in fashion) a nations capital under the circumspect that less (of an eaqual) was still (also an english distillery) more than a greater you might be considered circumspect as a capital…on the mark(germanically with the spelt grain, in purview having The Jew ish ness-T (ed)—(not executive director)…or in terms of tea cakes what one might say grey fruit…not the russian mold but um by and of seeing case of real non spelt harvest…actual wheat…outside of russia or agricultural plateaus having nothing not a thing to do with groats buckwheat or barley clover.
The interesting thing is that many of these people having no room for an urban groat (pyramid shaped natural pasta) resorted to the main staple of gardening or agriculture…mind you this was before botany and tulips…(in case WW1 ONE GOT TO YOU. the majority of historical fiction vs. Non fiction is rooted in stasis and since the persia had not actually been discovered as a land of tea obviously no body was taking the vegetable ie getting L”anded”.
Well you know it takes a lot of time and effort to get to where i have gotten. A lot of people i have wronged because they were assholes. moreover a lot of personal issues have been left unresolved due to time warps.
I dont mean for you know people in fucking st. Louis to think they have E nough acid to believe they are or was contingent. But…
It looks as though fashion has become the only economical contingency left in the plan b. plan a was meant to be just a lead but the key personalities were not as we should say ecologically super.
Now it would not be in my purview to accessories the wordiness it take to methout a t shirt but too bad for meth abuse…honestly do coke heads speak like that and furthermore what would fucking reagan the president have said about their south but north west speak. Jesus christ and his thorny west kike (non personal term and not referencing the type of thorny crown it would take to impersonalize that reference)
Was it just a new turn pike . here i thought all the asiatics were winning just for the sake that i could get the lead out of the pipes.
Anyways we have come to the point….and that is that the father or the mother were not mind you in fucking st. Loius getting their piece “arrested”
Furthermore there is nothing left to say for the families that actually were killing their slots on quarters. even plurally the insults were indicative that Fucking Elvis was not racially in their transistor so to have wasted so much time attacking the jesus sarcophogas with and undreaded lead piece most factually could have lead the false rosicrucian to the virtual actuality that their foundedness was and furthermore shall be that uh they really did not uh own the uh idea.
Now i know that you ought to say that these types of metaphors are unlicensed…and well they aren’t that fucked in the purview honestly you could do a lot lot worse…even cash the monkey may have yourse aquitted into the five house. But if i could speak more liberally about the atualy lead pipes under the pews well scotch jews would have you the atual reader literally uploaded into point…being that fashion was having where wall street merket Was giving…perhaps only to flying ants…not the metaphorical witchcraft ants which have been made obsolete to and witholding from due process alone by which only and perhaps mostly would the south have been possibly made available to gents of that which was both shoe and horn…or people that could not get fashion…even in italy.
So having said that the south is pointing to the tea cakes is not just as relevant as say had the south not been pointing much less alluding to the having been-ness of the tea cake…actual people may of been notified that the ants they’d seen had wing of and there which may have gotten by the point that the sword also winged would not have or there which in by gotten fashion. Now a pointed gentelman toe would not interpret fashion in this ilk because of the law being as one would say having more or in current /upmode terms as less than…in purview more than say central customs of any import company
From my point of view…looking at fashion is an interesting habit or occupation.
There is nothing in particular that makes fashion better or worse…more phenomenal or less phenomenol. obviously if you pay more attention to trends you will get more out of fashion in general…but why is that.
Do some people ever find fashion outside of a study or obsession and why is that casual person going to get so much out of their experience.
Is this why the world runs on a seven day week so that the casual observer can get a glimpse of the fashion system…logic of trends and production of media info.
Because some people may never think of fashion…does the media interpret that in any way? Is there fashion wthout lights on it and why does that fashion remain fashionable …or observable by the casual observer.
I have been working on a quilting project which has got me thinking a lot about heirlooms and how the past effects fashion.
Like what does someones history make them create or wear…or their blood lines. how does the art come out of the past and integrate into the present.
Or how do we know what is discarded in changing identities…modern. What makes it so…is freshness frugality etc etc.